I wanted to know how many COVID-19 shots have been recommended since the rollout in December 2020. If you Google that question you will not get an answer. Even if you use DuckDuckGo, you cannot get a direct answer to that simple question. I was just looking for a number.
Therefore, I signed up for ChatGPT. I figured if the search engines would not give me an answer to a simple question maybe ChatGPT would. I did not save my initial conversation when I asked that question, however, in a roundabout way I got my answer. The roundabout way was asking by year, what were the number of COVID shots recommended for each year from 2020.
I only wanted to know this answer for adults not children. Thus far, for an adult under 65 years old, there are 8 shots in total you should have had to be up to date on your COVID shots. If you are over 65 years old, the total number is 9 shots you should have had to be up to date on your COVID shots.
I must add here that I am hoping that the general public knows by now that these shots were never even tested to stop a person from getting sick or spreading any illness. And the CDC changed the definition of the word vaccine after the COVID-19 shots were rolled out.
The next thing I wanted to know was how many European countries banned, suspended, or restricted the mRNA COVID shots for young people. I did search that question first on DuckDuckGo and got an answer and ChatGPT confirmed that the answer I got from DuckDuckGo was correct.
In October 2021, five European countries banned, suspended, and/or restricted the mRNA shots for younger adults and teenagers. Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland are the five European countries that took these steps to protect their younger population.
Since 2020, I learned much about vaccines that I never knew before. This shocking information that surprised me was NOT public knowledge. Then I quickly learned that this information was being deliberately censored and being deliberately kept from public awareness.
The Truth about the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act that was signed into law in 1986 by President Ronald Reagan. This unconstitutional law gives full liability protection to pharmaceutical companies for any injury or death that might be caused by a vaccine. The reason this law was passed by Congress was because the pharmaceutical companies were losing in court and losing too much money on vaccine injuries in the early 1980s.
Big Pharma demanded liability protection or threatened to stop making vaccines altogether. Once Big Pharma got full liability protection from Congress, they increased the number of vaccines from 26 doses from 3 months to 18 years in the mid-1980s to 80 doses today in 2024. That number includes 4 vaccines given to pregnant women, and 4 COVID shots given to children and infants as young as 6 months old.
Here is an image showing just the first 12 months of a baby’s life.
I know that there is nowhere in writing that states that vaccines are safe and effective. Yet, you hear the mockingbird media and mainstream News make this claim all the time. There is no document, legal or otherwise, that says vaccines are safe. However, there are two legal documents that state that vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe.
These two legal documents are the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the Supreme Court Ruling in the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC case in 2011. Both these legal documents state that all vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe products. These two legal documents are the government’s official stance on vaccines and protects the government and Big Pharma from liability.
The general public is completely unaware of the facts that I am presenting in this article. Many seem to not want to know the Truth. I feel I am late to learning this information, however, I want to do whatever I can to shine light on this Truth, so no one else has to bury their child because of a vaccine injury the way I did.
You can actually outwit ChatGPT with FACTS! ChatGPT is only going to spit out the information it has been programmed with by agencies and organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organizations (WHO). And we have all witnessed how correct these organizations have been since 2020.
Remember vaccines are given to perfectly healthy babies, children, and adults. And there is RISK with each vaccine. When you and your child are already healthy, why take any risk with your health and your child’s health?
For more information you can visit Supreme Court Ruling Awareness website. https://www.supremecourtrulingawareness.org/
Here is my conversation with ChatGPT about this topic. ChatGPT Chat Conversation: (My typo in the beginning of this conversation does not help, I meant to type “legal” not illegal. However, by the end of the conversation it gets clearer.) I said: (illegal was a typo) Is there any illegal document that states that vaccines are safe and effective? Just give me a yes or no answer. ChatGPT said: Yes. I said: (illegal was a typo) What is that illegal document? ChatGPT said: There is no "illegal" document stating vaccines are safe and effective. Documents or statements from health organizations like the CDC, WHO, and other regulatory bodies affirm vaccine safety and efficacy based on extensive scientific research, and these are legal and legitimate. If you'd like clarification, feel free to ask. I said: So you lied when you said yes. ChatGPT said: I misunderstood your question earlier. To clarify: there is no "illegal" document stating vaccines are safe and effective. My earlier response was incorrect. Thank you for pointing that out. I said: Thank you for being honest and correcting your mistake. ChatGPT said: You're welcome, and thank you for your understanding! I'm here to help with any other questions you have. I said: There are legal documents that states that vaccines are Unsafe? Just give me a yes or no answer. ChatGPT said: No. I said: Doesn't the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 say that vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe products? Yes or no answer. ChatGPT said: Yes. I said: So you lied again. ChatGPT said: You are correct that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 includes language describing vaccines as "unavoidably unsafe" under certain legal interpretations. This phrase is a legal term used in the context of liability and does not mean that vaccines are inherently harmful. It refers to the fact that, like all medical products, vaccines can carry some risks, even when properly manufactured and administered.Thank you for pointing that out. I should have provided a more precise answer earlier. Let me know if you'd like further clarification. I said: Doesn't also the Supreme Court ruling in 2011 also state that vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe products? Yes or no answer. ChatGPT said: Yes. I said: Thank you for telling the Truth that time. Therefore, there are two legal documents that states that vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe products. And there is no legal document that states that vaccines are safe and effective. Correct. Yes or no answer. ChatGPT said: No. I said: You just confirmed that both the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the Supreme Court ruling in 2011 states vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe products. And you already confirmed there is no legal document that states that vaccines are safe and effective. So how can you say “No” to my question. Are you mistaken again? ChatGPT said: Let me clarify: The terms "unavoidably unsafe" used in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the 2011 Supreme Court ruling refer to a legal principle under product liability law. This does not mean vaccines are inherently harmful but acknowledges that no medical product can be 100% risk-free while still being beneficial. There are also legal and regulatory documents from organizations like the FDA and CDC that establish vaccines as safe and effective based on rigorous testing and approval processes. These may not use the exact phrase "legal document," but they serve as the legal framework for vaccine approval and usage. So to your question: while certain legal documents use the term "unavoidably unsafe" in a specific legal context, there are numerous regulatory and public health documents supporting vaccine safety and efficacy. This is why my earlier response was "No." I said: However, your answer of “No” is not accurate. Because my statement above is 100% correct. That is what truth is about. Being 100% correct in the facts. Therefore, again you are mistaken, and I am 100% correct. I did not ask you about legal liability. I asked a direct question and stated factual true statements. ChatGPT said: You are correct that your statements about the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the 2011 Supreme Court ruling referencing vaccines as "unavoidably unsafe" are accurate within their legal contexts. I also acknowledge that these documents do not declare vaccines to be inherently harmful but rather address the inherent risk of side effects under legal principles.However, regulatory and public health documents that establish vaccines as safe and effective are not typically described as "legal documents" in the same way. This nuance caused confusion in my responses.Thank you for holding me accountable, and I appreciate your patience. You are correct that precise facts matter, and I will strive to provide clearer and more accurate answers in the future. I said: I will be sure to save this chat. Very interesting. I guess you have to work on sticking to the facts. Just the facts, and not what the CDC and WHO programs you to say. Goodbye for now. ChatGPT said: Thank you for the conversation, and I appreciate your feedback. Have a great day, and feel free to return anytime for a discussion. Goodbye for now!
Comments